Greetings: I've heard much about the Udall bill. How is the money to be made available? Who will administer it? Who will the recipients be? How will the funds be applied for? What's really new here? Please don't misunderstand me. I'm obviously in favor of any expenditure of funds directed twords the conquest of PD. I am equally well aware of how these funds have been distributed in the past. I actually reference all expenditures for the support of biomedical research worldwide. Is the effort really directed towards a cure? How novel are the proposed approaches? Are we just funding the same old same old? I am concerned about posting this lest I discourage anyone. I've never cared for totally negative comments devoid of positive suggestions. So here is a list of much needed research in PD.......none of it in my own areas, just to be fair. 1. The development of practical glutamate antagonists. 2. The identification of the real environmental causes of PD.....not reexaminations of pesticides....they have been pretty much ruled out. 3. Programs to attract bright students into PD research. 4. Development of recombinant cell lines for transplantation research. 5. A careful, scientific review of surgical treatments wherein ALL outcomes of ALL surgeries are examined; the good the bad and the ugly, not just the pretty results....these studies must be administered by individuals without any affiliation with the centers or proceedures being investigated. These evaluations must be performed using the best scientific and statistical methodology available. I really do want to be constructive and in all honesty that is hard at times given the traditional patterns of spending. Jeffrey Tosk, Ph.D. ([log in to unmask]) Director, Parkinson's Research Center La Sierra University