 |
 |
Kafka's K., as the story evolves, finds himself more and more isolated. The K. relating his real story, through the responses of the the (virtual) community on the net, was made to feel supported and encouraged: He is most grateful. Some additional observations and clarifications: Brian Symonds wrote: "We want citizens to report dangerous or potentially dangerous situations, and have to create an atmosphere in which they can and will do that. How do you educate the people who took the time and effort (not many do as evidenced by stories on TV and in the press) to report K (presuming it wasn't malicious) without causing an atmosphere where people wouldn't report things?" The group of "concerned" citizens most likely posed as K.'s "friends" or "colleagues" or "neighbours". Would it not have been the "friendly", "collegial" or "neighbourly" thing to do to first confront K. with their concerns, citing actual instances of dangerous driving? In fact, no one came forward. The truth is, K. is probably now less of a traffic hazard than before he contracted PD. He is a person, can be talked to, and if he proves to be obstinate he can still be "reported". Do we really want to "create an atmosphere" where "people [...] report things" without concern for their neighbour? Some comments on "K's family doctor's role in this". The doctor last saw K. in January 1995. The first and only report was written in July 1995. K. had not thought initially that, having been in the care of and having trusted that physiciane for over ten years, a report could have been written without K. being advised of it. K. vaguely recalls the physician asking him in January: "Do you still drive", but remembers no advice to the contrary nor even an expression of concern. K. received copies of his allegedly "complete medical record", but they did not contain the report. Only when K. wrote specifically inquiring about reports written to "third parties" did he receive a copy and a letter. The report indeed contained the wrong dosage for Parlodel. The letter talks about the physician having been unable to communicate with K. and, the plot thickens, mentions that a "group of concerned citizens" shared the physician's views and had communicated them to SAAQ. This leaves only two possibilities: the physician is cahoots with the group of "concerned citizens" or the physician has learned this from SAAQ. K. will try very hard to find out which is which and will keep this virtual community informed!