 |
 |
Stephen Wardwell[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote: >I think the flame dangers are fairly remote. Spams, maybe some. > But >I'm on several newsgroups and spams are a miniscuole problem. Perhaps = PD might >attract quack cures, but those folks might get on the list and spam us = all > anyway. >Remember, it is possible to have a moderated newsgroup, if someone is = willing to >wade through everything every day. > > I agree--just ignore the spams and flames. I prefer the newsgroup = format, but at least with e-mail list, I get all messages. I don't know = about your news server, but mine, even with a good feed, misses quite a = few messages, so there is the possibility of a large gap in the = information. To those who don't like having to wade through a mass of = inbox messages, consider getting the mail in the digest format (one BIG = message!). ------------ Robert [log in to unmask]