 |
 |
One correction: Lobbying of Bilirakis and Bliley was ultimately sucessful. They finnally agreed to allow the bill to go to the floor for a vote. It wass Congressman Chris Smith's intention to debate the fetal tissue / abortion isssue that prevented the vote (hich we had enough cosponsors to win). The resason he was able to hold up this bill was because there was not enough time to debate the issue with Congress wanting to adjourn. Although Smith'ss re election seems certain, several of his idealogical allies have close races. Flannigan from Chicago is not expected to win in this heavily democratic district and Volkmer of Mo. has a tight race. I met with Flannigan personally. He was the most arrogant elected official I have run accross. He purposely seated us in a low couch in his office, then stood leaning against his desk so as to tower over us, while lecturing us as to how he would never support the Udall Bill as long as there was even the most minescule chance of even one penny supporting research involving an induced aborted fetus. It is closed minded individuals such Flannigan that I have a problem with. The Udall Bill had many pro life supporters some of whom were deeply concerned about the remote possibility of a woman having an abortion to provide fetal tissue for research. They were pursuaded by the laws prohibiting unethical use of fetal tissue. I presume some weighted this obscure possibility against the easing of suffering and the lives of 1.5 million Parkinson's victims. When dealing with those pro life zealots who simply say No, No, No if abortion is mentioned in the same sentense with fetal tissue, I always ask myself isn't my life worth something, especially when weighed against a miniscule if not totally fictious hypothetical event. We in the USA get to vote for those who represent us. I suggest we elect people of reason vs zealots. This abortion issue is a difficult one and hysteria only further complicates it.