 |
 |
Probably a misleading title but it leads me into something which has been concerning me more and more in recent weeks as a result of reading messages on this list.This was brought to a head by a recent posting from Berbado who seems to have got himself and I hope I don't sound too critical thoroughly confused on the subject of medication which is let's face it probably the most important and potentially rewarding subjects dealt with on the list and yet because of its mainly anecdotal character one of the hardest to evaluate. What is certainly evident is that the bulk of advice contributions come from subscribers who have had PD for several years or their PD is particularly severe and also a lot of requests for advice are re worst case scenarios.This I believe tends inevitably to promote an unbalanced view of the disease because there is no input from the thousands and thousands of sufferers who could be jogging along quite happily without any of the awful side effects mentioned so frequently.If you look at the results from independent clinical trials it is evident that the incidence of particular side effects are much less prevalent than would appear to be indicated by list 'gossip' Also in the list one tends to hear most noise from or about pd people with difficult or intractible problems. Having said all this I still think the list is great and required reading for anybody seriously interested in this baffling disease but although in the past I have been active in promulgating its merits to the 'unconverted' I am beginning to wonder whether there should be a 'HEALTH WARNING'--'Reading this might confuse you and seriously damage your peace of mind.Access denied to anxiety prone people'And when somebody from a National PD organization said to me recently 'No we are not keen on giving out information about the Internet as we have no control on what appears and might appear to be endorsing the views or information put forward' I began to wonder whether she was making some sort of valid point.?