> > Hi Rick: How are you doing? I hope all is well. . . > > > > I'm contacting you to see if you can give me a good lead on the subject of > > tropes. I'm teaching a course called Media and Development at Trent and > > we've done a module on Eurocentrism. I tried to present the concept of > > trope to describe the grammar of Eurocentrism as embedded into our > > cultural practices, dominant texts, etc. I searched for a good definition > > of tropes (Hayden White, Ricouer, your textbook, etc.) but never found one > > to my liking. The working definition I proposed was "a figure of thought, > > a conceptual trigger which conjures up associated meanings." I also > > presented the notion of root metaphor (Pepper) as an analogous concept. > > > > A student brought in a book by Marcel Danesi which defined tropes as > > "figures of speech" and which listed only metaphor and metonomy as examples. > > At least in North American schools, the distinction between figures of > thought (tropes) and figures of speech (schemes) seems largely to have > been lost. If one makes the distinction (and it is traditional), > metaphor and metonomy are figures of thought while alliteration (which > affects sound but not sense) is a figure of speech. I think it is the > concept that matters, the notion that certain sorts of figures are not > just decoration, that they influence our perceptions and understandings. > Thus what Pepper called a ROOT METAPHOR (and what Burke, about a decade > earlier called a MASTER METAPHOR) is a metaphor that shapes (or is at the > root of) a community's way of perceiving and interpreting something > important. Cf., e.g., the way the computer has replaced the telephone > switchboard as the master metaphor for the human brain or the way > business metaphors (e.g., customer, market) are displacing other terms > (e.g., citizen, community). > > In simpliest form, the notion (from I.A. Richards' _Philosophy of > Rhetoric_, which lies at the root of most discussion of metaphor) is that > the symbolic action of a metaphor is to direct attention to those aspects > of primary subject that shared with (i.e., also signified by) the second > term of the trope. So referring to students as customers of the > university or school directs our attention to the ways in which students > are like our commonplaces about customers and deflects our attention from > ways in which students are not at all like our ideas about customers. > N.B., as the metaphor 'men are wolves' (a standard example in discussions > of metaphor) indicates, it is not the reality but the commonplaces evoked > by the 2nd term that shapes the action of the metaphor. > > > My working definition was based on my coursework with you - does it jive > > with your conception of trope? Do you have a favoured citation for this > > concept? > > At Theresa Enos' request, I have explicated the above (and other > important stuff I think I understand about metaphor in particular, tropes > in general) in the _Encyclopedia of Rhetoric_ (Garland) under > "Metaphor." (Including a critique of the current traditional > reductionist misunderstanding and an extension into the concept of analog > signifiers in general.) > > Presumably your library has it (because it costs about > $100). The list of references for that article includes works by > Aristotle, Barthes, Beardsley, Burke (appendix to the -Grammar_), > Derrida, Gilbert and Gubar (on sexual metaphors for writing), Gould, > Irigaray, Jakobson, Lakoff and Johnson, Pepper, Perelman, Richards, > Ricoeur, Sacks, and Seitz--probably more than you want, certainly enuff > to get past a dissertation committee (and some of which you likely read > in that course). > > > My course carries on through April so it's never too late to return to > > the issue. Also, I'm trying to present a case for the cultural > > significance of the trope of consumption in my thesis, so any input you > > have may influence me there too. > > > > I hope I'm not asking too much. (If you do spend time on a response and > > would prefer to post it back to me via CASLL - so others can enter into > > the discussion and/or benefit from our interchange - I think that might > > be a good idea. . .). > > > > Best, Michael > > > Hope that's useful. If not, try me again in two weeks (which is the next > time I'll be on line). > > Hope to see you soon. > > Rick > > cc: CASLL > >