 |
 |
Ernie Peters wrote: <Thanks to those who did reply, but based on those replies we could only <expect 10% of people on the list to respond to the survey. This is clearly <nowhere near enough so, disappointingly, the survey idea fails. Barb has <posted the definitive theories for the lack of response so I need not add to <that. Even though I did not react when expected, I want to say that I am interested. Depending on how it is done, I will cooperate. Does 10% of people on the list mean 10% of everybody, including non-active ones? That would mean some 120 people, IMO a reasonably large family. Don't lets go of the idea just yet. Will Will A. Kuipers 103325.2723compuserve.com