 |
 |
From: "Debbie White" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: No more tremors Date: Sun, 4 May 1997 21:54:05 -0400 Don't see how you get the premise: "There is no diagnosis, if there is a chance that the diagnosis is wrong." Nor do I see how it follows that "If it cannot be diagnosed, it cannot exist." But I do agree that "If it does not exist, we do not have it." Let's hope that leads to the desired conclusion soon. Debbie White [log in to unmask] ---------- > From: Heather Elizabeth Baird <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: No more tremors > Date: Sunday, May 04, 1997 5:00 PM > > In our scientific world, with all our knowledge, with all our > tools, with all our machines, with all our computers, you mean to > tell me, we still can't acurately diagnose Parkinsons? > Therefore, as logic demands, there is no diagnosis, if there is a > chance that the diagnosis is wrong. Consequently, if it can not > be diagnosed, it can not exist. If it does not exist, we do not > have it! > [log in to unmask]