 |
 |
In a message dated 97-06-02 00:26:02 EDT, [log in to unmask] (robert l dolezal) writes: << Several felt that the current >Listserv has too many additional postings that make much of the valuable >Udall info time consuming and hard to find. Please let me have your thoughts >on this ASAP >Thanks, >Lawrence S. Hoffheimer >NPF Washington Counsel >[log in to unmask] >> Hi Larry; I think that a seperate list serv for the advocates would be very helpfull. However not to splinter the group I think a copy to Barbara's list server is a good idea. But also many on Barbarba's list are not interested in Udall History. Perhaps the copied message could clearil state that it is a Udall subject message. Just a prefix ie. UB should alert the scanners not to read message if that is their option. Dale Severance Syracuse, NY.