Print

Print


Janet.....

I'm not prepared to offer any suggestions regarding your medical condition
(I'm woefully ignorant 'bout two out of the three diseases ya mentioned).

I CAN, however, make an executive decision (errrrrrr.... in THIS group, THAT
means shouting louder than anyone else!) <grin> and say we'll change the name
of our as yet un-named boat (or is that "ship?") to the "Good Ship_____ "
<----- name of choice) <and NO... the "Good Ship Lollipop" is NOT an option>
so you'll better be able to say the name of this proposed vessel.

No... no..... don't thank me.... I'm always happy to go around spreading
sunshine and light and making executive decisions for all and sundry! <giggle>
(I'd make a good general!)

Barb Mallut
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From:   Parkinson's Information Exchange  On Behalf Of Gary J. Cornwell
Sent:   Monday, June 09, 1997 10:17 AM
To:     Multiple recipients of list PARKINSN
Subject:        (A Cause?)

I am new to the list and my husband's name appears in the e-mail address
but I am the one with Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple System Atrophy
and Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (just lucky I guess).  I'm not sure  what
fraction I am, but it appears we all have something in common if it's
not the denominator.  I'm guessing I'm 45/5, and hoping it's not an
IQ or something like that.

I have enough evidence to satisfy myself that I know the cause of my
disease,but to give it a fair and just hearing would it be permissible
to have you serve as judge, jury, & counsel for the defendant on-line?
The evidence to you must be hearsay, there being only one witness in
most instances - the victim - me - but maybe  by some means you can
ferret out the truth of the matter.  Is this ok?  Some of you may have
read part of my story at the Webforum  at MGH.  That will give you quite
a bit of background information. I'll have to drop the legal analogy
before long because I'm neither a lawyer nor a doctor or anything close.
Should I go ahead and present my evidence or not?  I really want an
impartial trial and the truth to be known.  As it stands now I am
totally
alone in my belief, and if I am proven wrong I will say that I had
gotten to the place that I had few choices, the two most obvious being
(1) die trying or (2) just plain,  so I have been working on option (1).

I have sailed on a few occasions around in the Chesapeake Bay near
Anapolis, Maryland and I have one comment about the ship naming deal.
With as much schlurred schpeech as I have had at times S.S. ANYTHING
is bad news as far as pronunciation goes. Thanks.

Janet Cornwell ([log in to unmask])