 |
 |
Why is second-hand smoke worse than actually smoking a cigarette? How can such a thing be possible? Plus, unless one quits breathing after sucking down a cigarette in a closed envirement, rebreathing the residue must be the equilivent of smoking a full pack. Why would any smoker want to rebreathe the same smoke over and over again? I've never heard a smoker claim inhaling cigarette smoke to be healthy, much less rebreathing the same dirty air. Sharon ([log in to unmask]) At 06:37 PM 7/1/97 -0400, you wrote: >Second-hand smoke is much worse than actully smoking a cigarete. You would >have to isolate yourself if you don''t want to be exposed. And that would >make for a very dull and lonely life. > >Edie Luther >[log in to unmask] > >