 |
 |
janet paterson wrote: > > hi cyber-dad-don > > you wrote: > >... and please no more money sent. > >i was up set over it > >my baby said i should be proud of the help. > >say see ddaddy your good deeds are ccoming home to you. > >who sent the 100.00 will be used for a ggood cause > >if i can bring my self to use it for me. > > i have to admit to taking part in the conspiracy > > i did not send the money to you > but 'anonymous' asked me for your address > and so i gave it to him/her/them > [and wild horses will never drag the name out of me!] > > your 'baby' - your youngest daughter has the right idea > i think your good deeds are going full circle > you had better get used to it! > > i know that the gift of money was not intended to upset you; > it was sent out of love and admiration for your spirit > and for your generosity in helping others > and all that good 'mooshie' stuff > > i also know that the primary motivation > was to pay for two hours of computer consulting time > so as to help get your computer working properly again > > [we both realized it wouldn't be nearly enough to fix your keyboard > but, hey, we can dream, can't we?] > > so, you had better 'bring yourself' to use it for its intended purpose > or you will have to answer to 'anonymous' > through me!! > > in your own spirit of generosity, > you say you want to do so much to help others > it's bound to make you feel good about yourself > > sometimes you can help others > by 'allowing' them to express their own generous instincts > thus helping them feel good about themselves > > this 'love thang' is a two way street, you know!! > > your conspiratorial [and proud of it!] cyber-sis > > janet > > janet [log in to unmask] Janet, you said it so well. I willl just second it. Nita Andres [log in to unmask]