 |
 |
At 10:05 AM 12/21/97 +0000, Brian Collins wrote: >On Sun 21 Dec, Debbie White wrote: >> With respect to your ifnger tapping test, I cannot do better than 50 taps >> in a 10 second period and I do not have PD. >> >> Debbie White >> [log in to unmask] >> >> >> >Hello Debbie, Am I to assume that you have written the IBM PC version of >my program, or do you have access to the proper test box? > >If you have managed to write the IBM PC version which I asked for - Well >done! You are the first to respond. Please send details. > >Regarding your test result of 50 taps, I have already found that non-parkies >exhibit quite a range of results: my daughter scored 95, and her husband >scored an incredible 120! He is into computer games playing however, and >they do that sort of thing all the time. > >So we already know that non-parkies show a large variation, one to another. >Also that the non-parkie group overlap the Parkie group. I am not too >surprised at those results: The real test is to measure the variation which >a single pwp exhibits when he/she is in the ON condition, compared to when >he/she is in the OFF condition, and whether there is a measurable progression >between the two extremes. > >Regards, >-- >Brian Collins <[log in to unmask]> > brian i did not see your test all i know they slowed my mouse doun as slow as the could cause some times i will run one letter all cross my scren and got to delete them any help don