 |
 |
Brian, I'm a bit confused on this ..... not to be picky or anything but what is the point of a shorter "tap timelimit"? I'm sure that you've a really valid reasoning. Surely I'm mistaken in thinking that the "tap stamina" would factor in somewhere..... how will you quilify the results ? if the tap test is 10 seconds ... will you times that by 6 to get a "minutes"worth?or even 30 second testings times 2 for a "minute" ... wouldn't the stamina issue factor into this because of the "pd" quirks? I'll understand completely if you want to tell me to "shuffle on along" <G> ... just curious that's all. ::: moving back to the peanut gallery::::) Elf in Tn...Romona http://members.aol.com/elf808/index.html <---newbie webpage but it's in color <G> Elf wife to Tony (my hero), and mom to Tori (age 9, nda), Zach (age 7, multichallenged), Cory (age5, multichallenged). The boys have no definative Dx but several labels... Ataxia,Nystagmus, Strubismus, Dystonia, Parkinsonism, Asthma, Execma, Hypotonia, Spasticity....ect Collectively the Dystonia/Parkinsonism effects the boys from eyes to toes and progressing steadily. Currently Cory & Zach are taking Sinemet, Lodosyn and Cory has had 4 rounds of Botox, uses a walker or WC for mobility. In a message dated 97-12-30 13:18:44 EST, you write: << Hello Bonnie, Yes, I would like tapping results from people without Parkinson'S as well BUT I CANNMOT use the 60 second result which the program currently gives. Hopefully John Cottingham is working on the change, and we will be up and running. Meanwhile please DO NOT send me 60 second data Regards, -- Brian Collins <[log in to unmask]> >>