Print

Print


hi barb brock

you wrote:
>How can we tell anything about anyone over the web?

we can't
that is the problem/blessing paradox of this amazing medium
the anonymity can be used for any purpose

with e-mail, i cannot judge you on your
profession/life-style
clothing/appearance
abilities/disabilities
accent/nationality/religion
skin/hair/eye colour

this can create the ultimate democracy
every participant has an uncensored voice

i have only the words and the fact of messages sent
to base any judgment/opinion on

the other side of the coin is:

i have only the words and the fact of messages sent
to base any judgment/opinion on

this paradox requires more work on my part
in reserving my judgment/opinion
until i've considered carefully
what has been presented

'words are cheap'
'actions speak louder than words'
'walk your talk'

are all truisms
which need to be reinterpreted
in this new era

>..Granted that I didn't see the original post but to conclude
>that someone who shares interesting websites is necessarily a hustler

i read tami's first post several times very carefully
so i felt comfortable in my suspicions
i did not conclude anything

since you have not read the posts being discussed
how can you come to a conclusion
without making assumptions?

>...Sounds to me like Tami could have had good motives ...

maybe
maybe not
she still has not answered a direct question
how can any conclusion be drawn?

the anonymity of this medium is a double-edged sword

>...and be feeling indignant because they were
>questioned in the way that they were....

i don't understand why anyone
would feel indignant about a simple question
unless the indignation is based on a sense of false pride or guilt

viz
i don't feel indignant by your questioning me
i'm happy to explain my reasoning behind anything i do or say
and am open to suggestions or debate

as i said to tami
i would love to be proved wrong

in the past,
i have referred to myself as cynical
and now realize that i may have been using the term a tad loosely
since i have just found that the oxford dictionary defines a cynic
'as a person who has little faith in human sincerity and goodness'

i have a lot of faith in humanity's sincerity and goodness
but i try to remain impartial and assumption free
until i have enough information to go on
in re any individual i encounter


your cyber sis

janet

janet paterson / 50-9 / sinemet-selegiline-prozac / [log in to unmask]