Hi Jonathan A great posting again and I have had time to consider what you are saying . I write and think slow . It seems that your hook up systems expand systems rather than deal with general systems failures . It would be very good at dealing with a failure of a particular system ( say blindness ) by putting other systems in to compensate but I feel it would be difficult to do in a general systems failure ( like PD ) . Let me use the computer analogy . Epilepsy is analogous to a computer crashing . The brain has an automatic reboot system . 2) PD is analogous to when my computer goes into a strange loop where the cursor position continualy flicks between the hour glass and the pointer ( PD tremor ) . Some functions work some dont ( as with PD ) 3) Blindness is analolgous to the corruption of a particular exe file in a particular program . In 3 it id possible to retore some functionality with the use of exe files in other programs . In 2 functionality can be restored by probably (?) interfering or blocking the loop ( PD pallidotomy ) The analogy is of course deficient in many ways . The most obvious is that a computer is hard wired but neural connections are plastic . I think your ideas are great but may be more use in expanding the conciousness and potential in an ordinary functioning brain rather than correcting PD dysfunction . I am just off now to build my coils for my much more modest experiment . I hope yours is done . > "sonification" allows multi-parameter information to be rendered as a > single, custom designed, "sound stream", by the mapping of electronic > signals to complex sounds. There has been some giant steps in this area, > and only a small and obscure group of scientific investigators are aware of > these developments, or had time to contemplate the implications. Coupled > with deep brain stimulation, sonnification may be a useful tool in > perceiving and altering the neurodynamics in real time. > > Recent technology makes it theoretically possible to create a display with > which a neurologically impaired person would be part of the "loop" > receiving and responding to the brains electrodynamic state with > articulation and immediacy. > > The neurophysiological factors that have the most compelling effects on the > functioning of the system involved in Parkinson's Disease, determined by > evoked potential experiments or other means are presumably what would be > manipulated. These may include frequency, amplitude, location site within > the brain, sequencing, etc. > > Perhaps two different electrical frequencies would be fed simultaneously > to separate electrode sites, or the same frequencies fed in varying > sequence patterns . Or stimulation might be made contingent upon signals > received from various electrode sites. Naturally this would be a > cumbersome process by trial and error alone. But with the brain itself > being part of the loop, this might be a whole different ball game. > > Thirty years ago, in a series of experiments at Smith Kettlewell Institute, > a video camera and matrix of stimulators was used to create images on the > back of non-sighted subjects [thus using the back as a "retina"]. When > subjects in these experiments were given control of the camera, their > understanding of what they were looking at "out there" took a qualitative > leap forward. Perhaps similar advances may be found by combining > sonification with deep brain stimulation in a feedback loop. > > peace Alastair ( [log in to unmask] )