Hi George-- In Ohio, the Central Ohio PD Assn. located in Columbus is now producing an excellent set of introductory pamphlets to be given to newly- Dxd patients by their doctors. You might want to be in touch with the Pres. of that group, Michael Beetner <[log in to unmask]> as some of their experience might be helpful to your indertaking. I will send Michael a copy of this post....good luck! SNIPPED >Second . The Plan, or at least My Plan. > A Few Assumptions > MDs are, by and large, not the best people to share >such a diagnosis as PD but of course they must >because.............................You can fill in your own reason. I do >not say this lightly. I don't think physicians are especially mean spirited >or nasty [although we've all seem to have meet our share]. What they often >lack is the open sensitivity to speak beyond the diagnosis and they often >don't know much about community resources for their sick people/patients > > Newly diagnosed PWP don't hear especially well when >informed of such a diagnosis >as PD. So what you commonly have is two or more people engaging in a form >of denial. >Now, I happen to believe that a certain amount of denial is healthy >but........... > > Not everyone is on the Internet. >My Plan > > In the last few months I've been giving talks on PD and my >experience with a staged bilateral Pallidotomy featuring my video. As a >part of the experience I've been giving each person attending a packet of >information which includes a few articles on PD, a few more on >Pallidotomies, a medication alert card, Tom Riess' article on parkinsonian >speech, some humor, a few still pictures of me during surgery , a few of my >short stories etc. Next week I'll be chatting with a group of elderly PWP, >in March I'll be sharing the speakers role with a well known PD-wise >neurologist at a presentation for the local hospital's nursing staff, and >in early April I'll be talking with a PD support group in Keene NH. > With each group I've changed the packet a bit. Currently I'm >developing the sections dealing with Social security/ Disability and >alternatives to traditional medicine. What I 'm expecting to develop is a >take-it-home packet that would be given to each PWP/caregiver at the time >of their initial diagnosis or at any other appropriate time. > I've compiled a list of nine key people who represent organizations >that are likely to have initial and /or ongoing contact with PWP. I've been >talking with these physicians, social workers, visiting nurses , etc. who >would most likely have this important contact. Having PD and having lived >and worked in this area gives me a certain amount of credibility. The plan >is to give such a packet of information to the PWP and seek their >permission to have someone [me initially] call on them to go over the >packet and/or try and answer any other questions within a day or two. With >their permission I will continue to send [or more likely hand deliver] >updated or new information for their packets. > The Acton-Concord area of Massachusetts is a fairly close knit area >and I think that we will be able to initiate and maintain contact with the >vast majority of PWP. May be too ambitious but we need to try. Only a small >number of PWP use the Internet so perhaps we will be providing a useful >service. I've had some recent contact with Margaret Tuchman and she >encouraged me to put this idea out to the list in hope of sparking others >to give it some thought. > >My questions for you: > > What do you think of the idea? > > Would you be interested in putting together such a program in >your area? > > Can you reccommend any articles for inclusion in my packet? > > Special question for Ron, Don, Kathy, Millie, Jeanette, Marling, >Larry, Peter, Janice, Delda, Sid, Charles, Debbie and Murray. Would the >availability of such a packet been of some help to you? > >Thank you > George > > >[log in to unmask] Camilla Flintermann, CG for Peter 79/8 Oxford, OH [log in to unmask] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ask me about the CARE list for* * Parkinson's caregivers ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *