 |
 |
In my study on the terms for the plays, the players and the playing places in the Netherlands (14th-16th c.) I've dealt shortly with the role and treatment of women in the context of town recreation policy. The council of Arnhem has paid a group of entertainers who were playing at the dancehouse for some women (1), entry was paid for women to see a spectacle at the winehouse (2), entertainment (for women?) in a private house was paid(3) (1) den vrouwen te spoelen opten danshuse 1 gulden (2) ..voor die vrouwen in een kaepspil van Maryenborch 8s. (3)...doe die gesellen mit her Dircks wyff van Arnhem dansten in her Dircks huys 8 quarten wyns There is one witness of a sort of performing by young girls, probably doughters of burghers die ioncferkens van de stat hair spill gespoilt (Hattem, 1470) There are some question marks about the dancehouses, game- or playhouses (speelhuus can mean both), they were frequented also by women (there is a text of 1325 concerning workgirls in Brussels), and it is known that there were winehouses which were also gamehouses and brothels. I'm also still wondering if the >>anti-theatricalism [in] comparing actors to whores<< could go so far as to put the word *fornices* on the picture of a theater (Badius' Terentius-edition). Reference to all iconography and texts in the last paragraphs of my article (in German) 'Quando sagittari sagittaverunt papegay. Der Medienstreit im mittelniederländischen Theaterbetrieb' In: NEERLANDICA WRATISLAVIENSIA 1994.VII:77-96, available since April 1997 at: "http://www.medianet.pl/~dab/and/quando.htm" Dr Andrzej Dabrowka Uniwersytet Warszawski, Instytut Germanistyki Browarna 8, PL-00-311 Warszawa