 |
 |
Camilla H.Flintermann wrote: > > Our Rep. John Boehner, who is a Republican "mover and shaker", was > unfortunately unalterably opposed to Udall, and refused to sponsor. He is > not on Appropriations, thank goodness! I will call his office just to let > them know we're still in there advocating, but have little hope it will do > any good--we've bugged him and "educated" him for years with no luck! > :-( :-( :-( :-( > > > > >At 12:22 PM 3/9/98, Nita Andres wrote: > >>I, too, have been disapointed by the lack of response from the list. I > >>hope you are doing more than I see. Even my friends from around here and > >>even from Canada (US citizens) are calling. I have wondered if you think > >>that you or your loved one are too old to benifit. If so, remember there > >>are plenty of young onset people on the list and those not on the list. > >>Nita Anders > >>[log in to unmask] > > Shalom, Camilla <[log in to unmask]> > > ################################# > # "In matters of conscience, # > # the law of majority # > # has no place." # > # ---Mohandas K. Gandhi # > ################################# Thank you for responding-my senators were the same. I really do not mean to be harsh-if fact it takes more nerve than I usually have fo write in so much. My congressman is a co-sponser but hard to reach< in Washington, so I just send faxes. And thank you for responding-Research gets no where without money-I am sure you know that because you do so much work on the list and thank you for that. Shalom to you too, Nita