Print

Print


I wasn't going to comment on this subject because I understand very little
about how politics works. But I feel I have some input to the subject.  Let
me keep this simple.   I have been a research subject at NIH and stayed 12
days with them.  We had many conversations on many topics including
earmarked money.

Let me jump to a story that happened while I was there.  I was repeatedly
tested for fine motor skills (every ten minutes of each day) One day I had
a sore throat and my motor skills improved,  Dr. Fang explained to me that
they know when the body is trying to fight off germs Parkinson symptoms
improve. He said that if they could reproduce the chemicals that the body
uses to fight diseases it might help PWP.

That story is only one of many.  How do you fund the unknown? If they use
earmarked money  wouldn't that exclude new ideas?

They were not excited about The Udall Bill because of the earmarked statis.
I don't understand......


I know that we just won one battle getting the bill passed, do we dare
complain about  how we will be given the money?

jjjane