 |
 |
Mr. Anderson: Here are some quick stabs at the answers to your three questions. Others may want to elaborate: 1. Chris Smith is not just anti-abortion; he is/has been the leader of the House "pro-life" caucus. Many, like Smith, who are zealous anti-abortionites are very good on OTHER issues. But don't pin any hopes on changing his mind on the "life" issues, including fetal transplants. I wouldn't waste my time, if I were you. 2. Most scientists seem to think that fetal transplants (I personally prefer the more generic and less emotionally-loaded phrase "neural transplantation"), whether involving humans or pigs or other animals, remains one of the most promising paths to repairing the body's dopamine-producing processes. NIH funded two major double-blind studies of human transplants about three years ago and the results are not yet out; maybe later this year. 3. The Udall bill does not specify particular areas of scientific inquiry. Anti-choice people in the Senate did make a move to ban research involving human fetal research from the bill last year, you'll remember, and we beat 'em in an up-and-down vote, about three to two. - Robin Elliott, Parkinson's Disease Foundation