On Sunday August 23, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation sponsored a symposium, "New Discoveries: Parkinson's Disease and Tremor Disorders". Speakers from the Cleveland Clinic included: Gene H Barnett, M.D., Vice Chairman, Department of Neurosurgery; R. Stanley Burns, M.D., Director, Movement Disorders Program; and Erwin B. Montgomery, M.D., Director of Research, Movement Disorders Program. Ray Watts, M.D., Associate Professor, Department of Neurology at Emory University School of Medicine, also spoke. (William C. Koller, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of Kansas Medical Center, scheduled to speak, was unable to appear.) Each spoke for about 20 minutes and a question and answer period followed. Dr. Montgomery, in his opening remarks, noted that a research project concerning the genetic factor in Parkinson's Disease will be conducted at the Clinic. To aid in this project, the Clinic is seeking as participants, families in which more than one member has Parkinson's Disease. Anyone meeting this criterion is urged to contact the Cleveland Clinic Movement Disorders Program, Department of Neurology, at 216-445-1108, or call the Clinic at 1-800-223-2273. Dr. Burns, speaking on New Medications for Parkinson's Disease, centered his remarks on Mirapex, Requip, and Tasmar, all introduced within the last year or so. He explained that Mirapex, which he described as "the simplest of the drugs to use", produces the effect of dopamine, but is a synthetic agent, as opposed to levadopa (Sinemet), a natural chemical. Dr. Burns noted that Mirapex is a long-acting drug which complements Sinemet in aiding tremor, balance, and postural problems, but also has some unique properties, providing both anti-depressant and anti-fatigue effects. He remarked that the "down side" of the drug is its capacity to cause confusion, hallucinations, psychosis and paranoia in some patients, and noted that, for these reasons, its use should be monitored. Dr. Burns characterized Requip as a "sister to Mirapex", with the distinction of more difficulty in adjusting dosage, but less likelihood of producing side effects. Tasmar was described by Burns as a complex drug with no intrinsic anti-Parkinson's Disease activity. By itself, Tasmar will do nothing, he noted; Tasmar must be used in combination with Sinemet. As the newest drug, learning how to adjust dosage is key , and it will take longer to optimize its effect. Tasmar's primary benefit is decreasing fluctuations (on/off periods); its primary challenge will be refinement in its use. Dr. Burns commented on new drugs now in the laboratory stage, noting that the goal is to improve the function of dopamine-producing cells still intact and to reduce the rate of progression of the disease. Dr. Barnett, speaking on Surgical Options for Movement Disorders, stated that surgery for Parkinson's Disease was not new, but was popular in the '50's and '60's, with thalamotomy being the most used, but then abandoned. In l992, the surgical treatment, pallidotomy, was developed, and interest in fetal transplant of dopamine-producing cells increased. In 1997, the deep brain stimulation procedure was approved by the FDA. Presently, thalamotomy is the procedure preferred for control of tremor. Pallidotomy, which destroys selected cells in the thalamus, globus pallidum, and sub-thalamic nucleus which have become hyper-active due to the death of cells in the substantia nigra, is more effective for other symptoms such as dyskinesea. The newest development, deep brain stimulation (DBS), implants electrodes in the brain, connected to a pacemaker located under the clavicle. Dr. Barnett distinguished DBS from the pallidotomy procedure by noting that the gamma knife, used in the pallidotomy, is "often but not always" perfect, and involves destruction of cells, whereas DBS is both adjustable and reversible. Dr. Ray Watts, discussing the future of surgery for Parkinson's Disease, explained that the fundamental problem is the death of dopamine-producing cells, and that the goal is to stop progression of the loss of such cells and, ideally, to restore their function. Early Swedish experiments in transplanting human fetal dopamine-producing cells found the area of the brain which develops dopamine was increased, to the extent that some patients no longer needed to take Sinemet. However, in the US, use of human cells has been controversial. Further, the need for an infinite supply of brain cells for transplantation cannot at this time be met. Presently, controlled trials of the use of pig fetal cells have shown that porcine cells are, at best, as good as human cells for this purpose. Dr. Montgomery, in distinguishing Essential Tremor (ET) from Parkinson's Disease, explained that ET tends to involve tremors of the head and is familial, unlike Parkinson's. He noted that, though ET is more common than Parkinson's, research in development of new treatments for ET has lagged, because no animal model is available; scientists have been unable to produce ET in animals. Dr. Montgomery remarked that, though a number of medications have been used to treat ET, none has been effective for more than a small percentage of patients, and side effects preclude their use for many. However, both Thalamotomy and DBS have proved to be useful surgical treatments for ET. Another movement disorder, Multiple Sclerosis, also involves tremor in approximately 15-20% of patients. Dr. Montgomery, while noting that the prognosis for MS is much better now than previously, explained that surgical interventions are not as successful for MS, since physicians are reluctant to destroy the thalamus, and adjustments of DBS are necessary repeatedly for MS patients. In general, Dr. Montgomery noted that the pace of developments in treatment of movement disorders is now so rapid that regulatory agencies can't keep up with it; the FDA is years behind, in many instances. It was notable that each of the speakers was "upbeat" and optimistic about the future. __________ Sid Roberts 68/3 <[log in to unmask] > Youngstown, Ohio