Print

Print


HELP!  I've used this address in the past, but maybe it has changed--will
someone from PAN please correct me ?
Camilla
*************
>Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>
>The original message was received at Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:32:03 -0400 (EDT)
>from stream.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.7.12]
>
>
>*** ATTENTION ***
>
>Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
>delivery.  The AOL address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
>labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".
SNIPPED
>
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><[log in to unmask]>
SNIPPED
><<< 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND
>550 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>
>   ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from stream.mcs.muohio.edu (stream.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.7.12])
>         by rly-za03.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
>         with ESMTP id JAA00165 for <[log in to unmask]>;
>         Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:32:03 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from [134.53.29.21] ("port 2048"@user.munet.muohio.edu)
> by po.muohio.edu (PMDF V5.1-10 #27005)
> with ESMTP id <[log in to unmask]> for [log in to unmask]; Thu,
> 22 Oct 1998 09:32:02 EDT
>Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 09:32:02 -0400 (EDT)
>Date-warning: Date header was inserted by po.muohio.edu
>From: Camilla Flintermann <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: C-SPAN and "earmarking" our $$$$$
>X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>To: Parkinson list <[log in to unmask]>
>Cc: [log in to unmask]
>Message-id: <v03102801b254aa9b2b39@[134.53.29.21]>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Friends-- on the C-SPAN "Washington Journal" this morning there was a guest
>from the staff of the appropriations committee, so I sent the following
>e-mail, and it was actually used:
>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Members of the large community of Americans with Parkinson's disease wonder
>how the budget bill ,which includes an increase in NIH funding, will affect
>them.  We worked for more than 2 years to pass the Udall bill for Parkinson
>research and education, and it finally was approved as part of  the
>Labor-HHS bill.  We understand that the NIH is resisting Congresdsional
>pressure to "earmark" the $100,000,000. which was approved for  the Udall
>bill for that use-- can your guest tell us whether the money will be there
>for us, now that research is so promising for a possible cure or better
>treatment for this progressive, incapacitating neurological disease?
>
>His reply was the usual "party line" about  NIH receiving a large increase,
>but it's not being wise for Congress to tell the scientists how the money
>should be spent.  Ho hum.............well, I tried.........
>
>
>
>>       Camilla Flintermann, CG for Peter, 80/9 <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>  http://www.newcountry.nu/pd/members/camilla/one.htm  My Home Page
>>
>>
>>              * *****    *****    *****    *****    *****  *  *****  *****  *
>>              *
>>*
>>              * Knowing when to insist, and when to let be,     *
>>              * is,perhaps, a lifetime learning experience        *
>>              *                 --Mary McCurry
>>*
>>              *
>>*
>>              * *****    *****    *****    *****    *****  *  *****  ***** *
>>
>