 |
 |
In a message dated 10/18/98 11:53:08 AM Central Daylight Time, [log in to unmask] writes: << It worries me most of all when anger is being portrayed as preferable to acceptance. Of course we have to experience anger. >> Dennis, What's to accept? Acceptance implies permanence. This stupid disease does not allow any permanence. Once one accepts one thing, another damn thing comes along. Meanwhile, there is discomfort and disability. Anger is not always such a bad thing: When someone refuses to do good on the basis of "principle," that makes me angry. It is my hope that bitterness, or maybe worry, not anger, is responsible for any damage. Regards, WHH 55/19