 |
 |
Dear Barbara , I do have some questions about this issue . How can any list member not being for life ? I believe everybody in this list is fighting for their and other lives .Now the point is if the discussions are directed for religious ( or ideological ones ) beliefs or for scientific ones . If they are directed to ideological or religious aspects it should be halted .( How can one during the Nazism be able to to prove to the nazi that they were wrong in exterminating jews ,else to the (Stalin's time) communists that they did not have the most perfect form of government , etc. ) Now if the discussions are directed for scientific purposes for the advance of human knowledge which may be important in curing diseases such as PD why should not if there are mutual respect and sincerity between the participants which want to see how wrong or right their views are ? Best wishes , +----| Joao Paulo de Carvalho |------ + | [log in to unmask] | +--------| Salvador-Bahia-Brazil |------+ Barbara Patterson wrote: > Let's call halt to the pro life / pro choice discussion. Each side > believes deeply that it is the 'right' side. We can agree to disagree on > that topic. Barb +----| Joao Paulo de Carvalho |------ + | [log in to unmask] | +--------| Salvador-Bahia-Brazil |------+