 |
 |
This looks OK--but be **sure** that there's an explanation at the top of the list as to what the numbers mean. >Camilla, > >How about cg for Peter 80/70/55 ? All the other cg's could follow this >pattern. > >Ivan >^^^^^^ WARM GREETINGS FROM ^^^^^^^^^^^^ :-) > Ivan Suzman 49/39/36 [log in to unmask] :-) > Portland, Maine land of lighthouses 50 deg. F :-) sunny and >"warm" >******************************************************************** > >On Wed, 2 Dec 1998 12:29:34 -0500 Camilla Flintermann ><[log in to unmask]> writes: >>>In a message dated 12/2/98 12:52:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, >>>[log in to unmask] writes: >> >>Janet-- I'm confused about my listing--- >> >>9. Camilla Flintermann / 10 / Oxford / OH / US / cg / >>[log in to unmask] >>(not edi) >> >>the "10" seems to signify nothing much--but is the # of years I've >>been a >>CG for Peter, and since you give the PWP's stats, his would be >>age80/ >>symptoms 55/dxd 10 >>I wonder if it's confusing to list the PWP's stats with the CG ? Maybe >>you >>could say "cg for Peter 80/55/10" to make it clearer, since he will >>not be >>listed separately? >> >>Camilla Flintermann, CG for Peter 80/9+ >>Oxford, Ohio >>http://www.newcountry.nu/pd/members/camilla/one.htm >><[log in to unmask]> >> >> "Ask me about the CARE list for >> Caregivers of Parkinsonians ! " >>