Charlie Meyer--if you feel called to attempt this assignment, more power to
you--you came to mind immediately when I read the notice. Go for it!
>Bob-
>
>I think that orientation is necessary and agree with it as a part of the
>requirements. This committee must be able to look at the entire mission
>of NIH. While one might be a representative for PD in the sense of
>wanting PD to get its fair share it would be grossly unfair to not look
>at the whole budget and health research priorities. I think that is
>what happened to us before and necessitated the Udall Act. While I
>fervently support the Udall Act it is a failure of NIH that it was
>needed at all. It is our self interest not to need to put our energies
>into fighting for equity in research funds with other diseases and
>instead put our energy into educating ourselves and the public about PD.
>
>The struggle for the committee member is the same as that of the Senator
>who is challenged with the choice of whether to support an clearly
>unneeded military base in his state. Is he a statesman and vote for
>what is right for the country or is he a representative of the economic
>interests solely of his state and vote for the pork barrel. It
>certainly isn't easy but what is necessary is clear.
>
>Charlie
>*******************************************************************************
>***********
>
>Charles T. Meyer, M.D.
>Middleton (Madison), Wisconsin
>[log in to unmask]
>*******************************************************************************
>***********
Camilla Flintermann, CG for Peter 80/70/55
Oxford, Ohio
http://www.newcountry.nu/pd/members/camilla/one.htm
<[log in to unmask]>
"Ask me about the CARE list for
Caregivers of Parkinsonians ! "
