 |
 |
First of all I think all the privacy/access discussion over the last few days was very valuable; I know I learned a great deal. The Parkinsn List Web page came as a surprise to all of us - some welcomed it wholeheartedly, others expressed doubts. The expressed majority opinion is clearly in favor of Web access, and many good arguments have been made for it. Now that we are all aware of how easily our e-mail messages can be accessed, we can make our own informed decisions about whether or not to post, whether to use our real names or an alias, etc. depending on our individual situations. Some people do have very valid concerns about their illness becoming public. They are not paranoid and they are not ashamed to have PD. Some have good reason to fear they could loose their jobs, or have their careers damaged, if their employers find out. Some have other equally important personal reasons to be quiet. Their desire to keep their condition to themselves must be respected, and no one should be made to feel guilty about doing so. I don't think most people ever realized that what many considered a subscriber only e-mail list has never really been private. Privacy in the computer age may be just an illusion. Yet, just like the glass of water, you can look at the Web issue in different ways as well. Most have said that since it is so easy to find information on people, what's the difference if we add another access point by putting the current 200 list messages on the Web? But couldn't you also look at it this way - if there is so little privacy today with the Internet, and all the computer files and records on everyone, why should we make it even easier to invade; why not preserve whatever privacy we can? Anyway, however we look at it, let's just try to respect each other opinions. There have been many exciting ideas about where we can go from here. And surely there are many ways for those who do not wish to "go public" to help further our shared cause. And thank you John for all your hard work. Linda