 |
 |
Bruce, I was the one who first suggested the change and I still think it is a good idea- but I do think that John's web page makes the list accessible to people who do not want to use e-mail to access the list because of the volume and who don't have the technical skills to set up filters and separate mail boxes. I do not feel strongly on the matter and just suggested it in a single post. I don't see it as hard or intimidating to ask one's self prior to responding to a post " Is what I have to say meaningful to other people on the list besides the individual it is directed at. If you can answer yes then at least on Netscape all you have to do is hit the reply to all button and the message is addressed to both the originator and the LIST. Charlie Bruce Anderson wrote: > ABSOLUTELY. Someone, don maybe, said recently he can delete 10 at a time. > No one needs to be a slave to too many posts - some days you can just delete > ALL your List mail; nothing important is discussed just for one day & then > dropped. > > Is there anyone out there other than our owner who wants to keep it as it is > now? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Virginia Christiansen <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Friday, February 05, 1999 10:35 AM > Subject: list options > > >Our wise Camella wrote: > > > >we're ALWAYS going to have to make a choice about what > >goes where, but better perhaps to delete silliness we don't want to read > >than to lose valuable info we may need.....just my thoughts, F W I W. > >Others??? > > > > > >Agreed > > > >Virginia Christiansen > > -- ****************************************************************************************** Charles T. Meyer, M.D. Middleton (Madison), Wisconsin [log in to unmask] ******************************************************************************************