 |
 |
Joan, Barb and all, As difficult as it sometimes is for me, surrendering to what may be politically correct is sometimes the more productive course to take............sometimes..........but that's why we have been blessed with semantics! Jay Henkelman [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: Barb_MSN <[log in to unmask]> To: Jay A. Henkelman <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> Date: Saturday, February 06, 1999 11:20 PM Subject: Re: Re: Social Security Review >Jay, Joan, et al.. > >The Social Security Administration wouldn't RECOGNIZE the "real >situation" if they tripped over it! <HUMPH!> > >Barb Mallut <speaking from YEARS of experience) <groan> >[log in to unmask] > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jay A. Henkelman <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> >Date: Saturday, February 06, 1999 6:00 AM >Subject: Re: Social Security Review > > >>Hi Joan, >> >>The process that you have described is the "norm" for all SSDI >recipients. >>For PWP that are experiencing intermediate to advanced symtoms >and/or >>complications that are debilitating and thus "disabling" as per SS >>guidelines, whether it be an "on or off" situation, I strongly >suggest the >>following: If SS requests that you see one of "their physicians" >for an >>evaluation to determine continuing SSDI eligibility, and you have >the common >>"on and off" scenario or worse, whatever you do, DON'T dance in for >your >>appointment "ON"!!! Be honest, show the real picture!!! >> >>Jay Henkelman >>49/39/30