Print

Print


I agree that we should go back to the way the list was.

I have received much information from the list and am concerned that I will
miss some very helpful information
by responding off list.  I have set up folders, one of which is entitled
"Parkinsons-Ask Dr."  I forward messages
that I would like to discuss with him to this folder and print them off to
take with me when I see him.  This helps
to remind me of things I wanted to discuss with him.

I don't write to the list very often, but do enjoy receiving all of the
information.  I also pass on information from
the list to members of our support group here in Columbia, Missouri.

Mary Watkins
[log in to unmask]
58/50/48

----------
> From: Camilla Flintermann <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Flaming, quitting, helping...
> Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 11:40 AM
>
> Dear Barb Patterson and  listfriends--
>
> Thank you, Barb for your post about our struggles.  I had hoped to hear
> from you, and am sorry you were sick--and made sicker   :-(
>
> SNIPPED
> You wrote in part:
> >
> >If Carole or anyone else who asked for information re pd in the past few
> >days would write to me, off the list, and let me know if you received
> >help off the list, I would appreciate it.
>
> This raises for me again the question of how the list "reply" option is
> set.  Several folks recently have requested (begged?) that we go back to
> having it set for "reply to list", not to sender, because of the problem
> you raised--we don't really know whether someone's question has been
> answered if replies go offlist.  I think we have trouble deciding what is
> appropriate for everyone  (what else is new?) and have been erring on the
> side of too much offlist info-sharing.  I've tried to  follow the
principle
> that a real question asked ON the list should be answered ON the
list--but
> even that gets murky at times.   Though I have liked some things about
the
> "new" way, I'm beginning to feel that the time may have come to revert to
> the "old" one.....we're ALWAYS going to have to make a choice about what
> goes where, but better perhaps to delete silliness we don't want to read
> than to lose valuable info we may need.....just my thoughts, F W I W.
> Others???
>
> Camilla Flintermann, CG for Peter 80/70/55
> Oxford, Ohio
> http://www.newcountry.nu/pd/members/camilla/one.htm
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
>                         "Ask me about the CARE list for
>                         Caregivers of Parkinsonians ! "