Hi Barb, Barb_MSN wrote: > possibly do, would cause you GREAT physical harm, or maybe WORSE! > Post-pallidotomy, one CAN usually reduce the drug dosage, however, > that should be done gradually, and in small amounts.I was able to > reduce the daily dose of Sinemet by about 1/4th of what > I took prior to the pallidotomy, and have pretty much been able to > stay right at that reduced level since then. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joao Paulo Carvalho <[log in to unmask]> > > >Brian Collins wrote: > > > >> I have always felt a little sensitive about the fact that my > Model > >> defines dyskinesia as being the result of the Dopamine level > exceeding > >> a critical value, and perhaps getting to synapses which were not > the > >> original target, thus sending the electrical message to the wrong > muscles. > >> > >> My point is that I can produce plausible explanations for most of > the > >> phenomena which we associate with dyskinesias (including the > dreaded > >> Di-phasic Dyskinesia) > >How to explain the fact that in SOME well done Pallidoctomy > (destroying some > >brain cells and neurons) there happens a elimination of the tremors > and a > >reduction or even the elimination of the need of taking levodopa ?? Barb , the point I was to trying to get across was how to explain that destroying more dopamine producer neurons (and other brain cells) with Pallidoctomy the result is then, paradoxically , the reduction of the need of the intake of levodopa .(remembering that the culprit of the symptoms is attributed to the shortage of dopamine in the brain) Cheers , +----| Joao Paulo de Carvalho |------ + | [log in to unmask] | +--------| Salvador-Bahia-Brazil |------+