Re: Cathy and Russ's recent comments on (1) "American style" composition approaches and (2) the theoretical positions of those who teach "bottom up," skills-based courses in composition. I'm _very_ interested in the whole issue of how cultural context affects what & how we teach--working with Henry, it would be difficult to ignore such issues, eh? But, as someone who has been accused (in print) of importing USAmerican ideologies into my critical & editorial practices, I'm wary of putting too much emphasis on an "us/them" framework. The 49th parallel is a highly permeable boundary, especially when it comes to the free trade of ideas. I'm uncomfortable with dividing up the field into process and product orientations--with the US championing process pedagogy, and Canada left arguing for well-edited products. A lot of process-oriented teaching & learning gets done (in English) here in Canada. What we lack is support for programs, journals, and organizations that would help "institutionalize" this teaching & learning? Inkshed/CASLL seems an important exception to this rule. Part of the problem, as Cathy suggests, may be a kind of "frame conflict" between theory and practice--though I suspect that some forms of deconstruction and even PoMo are highly compatable with what's being described as the "mechanistic" approach to language & literature. cheers, Will > What I find truely perplexing, however, is that some of these (often well > meaning) folk who advocate such mechanistic courses often have intense > theoretical backgrounds in deconstruction, culture theory, various forms of > postmodernism etc. These positions contradict their actual practices in > ways that I find difficult to fathom. Do their brains turn off or what? > > And by the way I think it is cheaper to run a "mechanistic" course--no > drafts, multiple choice grammar and style tests. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Hunt <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > Date: March 3, 1999 7:57 AM > Subject: Re: Issues in Composition at Cdn. universities > > > >Seems to me this is quite consistent with Rick's take on style- > >centered as opposed to effect-centered pedagogies. > > > >> What counts now as "American" style compostition are many of the > >> practices that many of us currently advocate. So for example > >> interactive workshops, attention to invention, drafts, > >> collaborative projects etc. etc. are often viewed (within English > >> departments) as strange foreign and not-to-be trusted practices. > >> > >> What counts as "Canadian" seems to be the mechanistic style focused > >> courses as present in many of the handbooks that have been revised > >> into "Canadian" editions. > > < < W.F. Garrett-Petts > > English & Modern Languages ._______ UCC, 900 McGill Rd | \ / | Voice: (250) 828-5248 Box 3010, Kamloops B.C. --|.O.|.O.|______. FAX: (250) 371-5697 B.C. V2C 5N3 Canada.__).-| = | = |/ \ | E-mail: [log in to unmask] >__) (.'---`.)Q.|.Q.|--. http://www.cariboo.bc.ca \\___// = | = |-.(__ `---'( .---. ) (__< \\.-.// `---' < < Writing is a Performance Art > >