 |
 |
Christine Skolnik wrote: > > This really sounds like you want to preclude certain perspectives. This sounds like we have a respondent to the panel. I'd suggest that in the interests of coherence the panel limit itself to "what works" but having a dissenting voice by way of rebuttal might also be useful if that voice considered the critical-pedagogical questions that Christine alluded to. What I would like to see us avoid is a panel that becomes us talking to ourselves again. If we wanted to do that we could pick an environ nicer than Minneapolis -- like say the west Edmonton Mall or South Porcupine. Besides we can always talk to ourselves over a great dinner like the one Anthony led us to in Atlanta. For those of you who missed out, we were at the Shark Bar eating authentic (?) cuisine such as blackened catfish, southern fried chicken, and Auntie Rosa's Shrimp gumbo. Rob Irish Rob Irish