I started this note this afternoon, before Tania's messages came through. Marcy =============== At the end of the conference on Sunday, Tania and Janet walked around asking a number of people why there isn't a refereed journal associated with Inkshed. I found the discussions interesting; I heard a couple of them, and from what I gathered, Tania and Janet were meeting considerable resistance to that idea. I'm curious to know where that resistance came from, or if it was really there. For my own part, I think of Inkshed as an "evaluation-free zone" -- a place where I come to learn from and be silly with people who I respect in the fields of language and literacy. I think a large part of its value, for me, lies in the fact that it is a sort of pedagogical playground; I can risk making a fool of myself (either on Talent Nite or in a session or on an inkshed) without worrying that I am ruining my career, or something. I don't think I'd play nearly so well if I felt like I wasn't -- for this weekend at least -- peers with everyone at the conference. I know that the people at the conference might referee my work in other contexts, and that's fine -- they won't in this one, though, and that's fine, too. I'm speaking strictly for myself, and I hope others will do the same . . . I hope this really does open up a conversation and not lead to a reaffirmation of dogma -- maybe others will feel, as Tania and Janet do, that it's high time Inkshed had a journal. Maybe I was imagining the resistance I thought I saw. What do others think? Marcy =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Marcy Bauman Writing Program, University of Michigan-Dearborn 4901 Evergreen Rd, Dearborn, MI 48128 fax: 313-593-5552 http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~marcyb [log in to unmask] =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=