Print

Print


CHarlotte, you have my support . Count me in on whatever you decide to do.
Hilary Blue

Charlotte Mancuso wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> Does anyone know how to reach this group: Web, e-mail etc.?  I would
> like to know the names of those 70 representatives who are opposing it,
> and how we can help this new group.  I feel strongly that we need to
> mobilize and help fight for more freedom to continue vital research.
> Thanks Judith for this important posting!
> 
> Ann, Palo Alto, CA
> ///////////////
> judith richards wrote:
> >
> > Coalition to fight for stem cell research
> >
> > WASHINGTON, May 21, 1999 (Reuters Health) -- Thirty patient advocacy
> > groups have formed a coalition in an effort to stop anti-abortion
> > lawmakers from halting federal funding of stem cell research, it was
> > announced here on Thursday.
> >
> > ``We want to make sure that as the debate goes forward, that we are here
> > to articulate the needs of patients and their families,'' said Daniel
> > Perry of the Alliance for Aging Research at a Capitol Hill news
> > conference to announce the establishment of the Patients' Coalition for
> > Urgent Research, or CURe.
> >
> > The goal of the coalition, whose members include groups ranging from the
> > American Cancer Society to the Parkinson's Action Network to the
> > Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation, is to educate the public, the
> > media, and legislators about human pluripotent stem cell research.
> >
> > Embryo-derived stem cells are immature cells that can give rise to just
> > about any type of adult tissue, and are considered a promising avenue of
> > research for a number of ailments.
> >
> > Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services in January
> > ruled that research using such cells derived from discarded embryos did
> > not violate Congress's ban on embryo research. At least 70 members of
> > the House have vowed to seek to overturn that ruling when Congress takes
> > up the department's annual funding bill late this spring or summer.
> >
> > ``The tissue to be used is tissue that is to be discarded anyway, tissue
> > that is in the process of being thrown away,'' said Dr. Glen McGhee, a
> > bioethicist from the University of Pennsylvania. ``Stem cell research is
> > an appropriate kind of research and it is absolutely critical that it be
> > federally funded'' in order to ensure that it is carried out ethically
> > McGhee explained. ``Only through oversight can we resist irresponsible
> > research,'' he said.
> >
> > After the press conference, Richard Doerflinger, a representative of the
> > National Conference of Catholic Bishops commented that most stem cell
> > research can already proceed with federal funding, including research
> > that has isolated stem cells from adult bone marrow and fetal tissue. It
> > is only the research in which the cells are derived from embryos that is
> > at issue, Doerflinger said.
> >
> > Even if the cells are derived without federal funding, ``the language
> > (of the existing ban) was always intended to deny funding for research
> > projects in which destruction of a human embryo is a part. What we're
> > trying to do is not have the federal government promote the destruction
> > of human embryos,'' he added.
> >
> > But Dr. John Gearhart, a Johns Hopkins University researcher who has
> > pioneered much of the stem cell work, said that all avenues for deriving
> > the cells need to be pursued. ``It is much too early in this game to
> > determine which derivation would be better,'' Gearhart said.
> >
> > Copyright © 1999 Reuters Limited.
> > --
> > Judith Richards, London, Ontario, Canada
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> >                          ^^^
> >                          \ /
> >                        \  |  /   Today’s Research
> >                        \\ | //         ...Tomorrow’s Cure
> >                         \ | /
> >                          \|/
> >                        ```````