I didn't understand janet's "I don't get it" post but I do understand this 1 from Hans. What I don't get is why does "something" have to be settled. IF 2 of our top "reporters" have a difference about a particular site, then so be it. That doesn't change the fact that I appreciate all the posts of both these dedicated & caring members. janet, this may be easier said than done, but don't be upset that another has a difference of opinion - your news posts are valued. Gosh, think how boring this world (& list) would be if we all had the same opinion. Hans, thanks for solving janet's riddle janet's, thanks for posting your opinion & thanks to all the others who post theirs Bonnie daughter of Jom 77/3 In a message dated 6/9/1999 12:28:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask] writes: > > >> What message are you responding to?? << > > >> and find my actions decried as paranoia and stomping > .huh? << > > > Ok, I found "paranoia", must have deleted "stomping"...... > > It must be near a full moon............ > First Ivan and Michael, > Now Janet and Judith and "X". > Can't these "misunderstandings" better be solved in private mail?? > > Hans. (paramused and bestomped) > >