Print

Print


Charlie,  ANY digging you could do on my behalf wouldd be greatly
appreciated.  Besides basically what feels like a partaial paralysis of my
legs [ i can feel them but they won't support me, & my feet freeze], my
other symptoms  are:
-severe quality of speech deterioration,
-inability to write intelligibly [teeth brushing & typing also affected],
-excess drooling & some modest swallowing problems/
-occasional constipation, both occasional urgency of urination and slowness
of starting urinatiion flow,
-stooped posture causing occcasional back pain, and [perhaps unrelated],
-forced eyelid closings,  which caused a car wreck, diagnoed as
bletharospasm but which has not been helped by repeated botoxin injections
as well as neurontin & clonazepan [after which the neuro opthamalogist at a
famed central NJ hospital said he was out of ideas]
Incidentally, my first symptoms were speech deterioration,  shoulder pain
and a resting tremor in one hand.

The only thing any of the neuros I have had [5 + various neuros at the VA]
have ruled out specifically has been Progressive Supra-nuclear Palsey, with
an eye test.

Sinement MAY have a subtle beneficial effect, but i;m not certain of that.

Charlie, i realize you didn't volunteer to be my diagnostisian,  just to
answer a specfic question re the PET scan.  I guess i'm just putting this
sorry  tale out there again in case someone recognizes  this combo of
symptoms as something with a name, while,  of course, i continue to look for
a doctor who can!!

Thanks,
bba [53, 5]

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles T. Meyer, M.D. <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: PET Scans-advice requested


> Bruce,
>
> Because of the seriousness of the diagnosis or lack thereof I want to
qualify
> my statement a bit.  If there is no sinemet response and the PET scan is
> negative in terms of no decreased activity and a sinemet response is also
not
> present,  then PD is highly unlikely.  If either is positive then I would
say
> that it is equivocal.  I don't know whether the diagnosis of PD is
> "officially"  sanctioned  in this way-  I will check-  but I think the
chance
> is quit small that the diagnosis of PD could be made in the absence of
both of
> these parameters.
>
> Charlie
>
> "B. BRUCE ANDERSON" wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Charlie.  I had no idea that the PET scan was that
definitive -
> > i'd  surely have had one years ago if i had known.
>
> --
>
****************************************************************************
**************
>
> Charles T. Meyer,  M.D.
> Middleton (Madison), Wisconsin
> [log in to unmask]
>
****************************************************************************
**************
>