 |
 |
what do you mean "go up to 44 emails per day"????? I miss the 75+ that I was told I would get when I signed up.......the more the merrier....you hae the choice....READ 'EM OR DELETE 'EM......Come on guys...w r i t e.....Joan -----Original Message----- From: Hawkins, Darwin <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> Date: Saturday, July 17, 1999 9:45 AM Subject: Can't please everybody! >Now this is getting rediculous and really funny. > >Here we have gone through this big flap about the volume of posts being too >high. >For whatever reason, the volume became less (probably due to that fire). > >Then we start reading questions, complaints and responses from people about >the reduced traffic. >I guess those posts feed their addiction and get the traffic back up to an >acceptable level. > >Digest #489 - 20 posts (2 about traffic) - about right for everybody > > "It's been awful slow on the list today. > Is everyone (else) taking an early weekend?" > > (We then got the response about the Bell fire in Toronto.) > >Digest #490 - 8 posts (0 about traffic) - whoops! This is entirely >unacceptable to only get 8 posts. > >Digest #491 - 22 posts-including lots of PIG stuff (4 about traffic) - >ahhh! Thats more like it. Back up to the list comfort level. >(must be 2 over my limit though or I wouldn't be writing this!) Uh Oh, the >next digest will have 23. > > List members: > I have not received a message from the list in nearly 24 hours. Is >there a > problem? If the list is up and running, then trouble must be at my >end. > Would someone be so kind as to let me know. Thanks. > Thomas Barrett > [log in to unmask] > > > I am receiving and sending. > > > I am receiving messages, but nowhere near the usual > volume. Carole H. > > --- Thomas Barrett <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > List members: > > > > I have not received a message from the list in > > nearly 24 hours. Is there a > > problem? If the list is up and running, then trouble > > must be at my end. > > Would someone be so kind as to let me know. Thanks. > > > > Thomas Barrett > > [log in to unmask] > > > > Hi Tom-- > I had problems last evening myself in connecting, so gave up! > I this reaches you -- have a great Saturday! > Sharon E. > >I AM ONLY KIDDING FOLKS. MAYBE I SHOULDN'T POST THIS. THE TRAFFIC MAY GO UP >TO 40 PER DIGEST OR STAY AT 22 AND GET TWICE AS MANY. NAHHHH! >