Print

Print


Lancet: Volume 353, Supplement 1  24 April 1999

Topical issues in selected specialties: Neural transplantation for
neurodegenerative disorders

Cesario V Borlongan, Paul R Sanberg, Thomas B Freeman

Lancet 1999; 353 (suppl I): 29-30

Cellular Neurobiology Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National
Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (C V Borlongan PhD); and
Department of Neurological Surgery, Department of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics, University of South Florida College of Medicine,
Tampa, FL, USA (P R Sanberg DSc, T B Freeman FACS)

Correspondence to: Dr Thomas Freeman, Department of Neurological Surgery,
University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33613, USA


Neural transplantation has a century-long history, but the modern era of
transplantation began in the 1970s. Parkinson's disease (PD) was the first
neurodegenerative disorder to be treated with transplant techniques because
symptoms are secondary to the loss of a limited number of nigrostriatal
dopaminergic neurons. The initial success of levodopa treatment for PD
suggested the feasibility of dopamine-replacement therapy by neural
transplantation, and the small size of the striatum (or caudate putamen in
human beings), which becomes dopamine-denervated in PD, makes it an easily
accessible target for transplantation.1 Preclinical studies since the early
1980s showed that tissue grafts of dopamine-rich fetal ventral mesencephalon
survive, reinnervate the brain, and improve parkinsonian symptoms in rodents
and non-human primates.2 On the basis of encouraging laboratory findings,
clinical trials of neural transplantation were started in the late 1980s.

Parkinson's disease
Several clinical centres have reported preliminary data that transplantation
of fetal tissue is beneficial for some PD patients, with some centres
obtaining more reproducible results than others. To date, more than 300 PD
patients world wide have received neural transplants of embryonic ventral
mesencephalic tissue. Of these patients, three have died because of the
surgery, and 11 from causes unrelated to the procedure.1 Clinical trials of
transplantation of fetal neural tissue were pioneered by Lindvall and
colleagues in Sweden. Subsequent trials of unilateral intrastriatal
transplants by these investigators showed graft-derived improvements on
fluorodopa positron-emission tomography (FD-PET) and in rigidity,
hypokinesia, dyskinesia, and the percentage of time in the "off" state for
up to 4 years. Patients gradually deteriorated during years 4-7 post
transplantation, most probably because of disease progression on the
non-transplanted side.3

These promising results obtained in Sweden prompted similar procedures in
the USA, France, England, Canada, Spain, Mexico, Japan, Cuba, Poland,
Russia, and China. The first histological evidence that clinical benefits
directly correlated with survival of grafted fetal dopaminergic neurons was
reported in 1995,1,4,5 and came from the brains of two bilaterally
transplanted PD patients who died from causes unrelated to surgery.
Examination of the grafted tissue in PD patients who displayed improvements
clinically and on FD-PET showed that robust graft survival was characterised
by variable neuritic outgrowth (2·5-7 mm within the striatum and 11 mm
within white-matter tracts) extending towards and forming synaptic
connections with the host tissue, but no host sprouting was observed.1,4 The
graft reinnervated up to 78% of the target region, producing a morphological
picture typical of normal striatal innervation (figure). The grafted cells
were spared from the neurodegenerative process. Grafts were metabolically
active, could take up, synthesise, and store dopamine, and had intact
blood-brain barriers. All grafts survived in the absence of any
immunosuppression for at least 1 year.

Neural transplantation remains experimental. At best, moderate clinical
improvement has been observed. Graft success can be influenced by several
technical variables, including donor age, technique of tissue storage,
method of graft preparation, number of donors, distribution of graft tissue,
site of implantation, whether transplantation is done unilaterally or
bilaterally, and concomitant treatment with trophic factors and
anti-oxidants.1,6 Clearly, there are numerous ways to improve grafting
strategies for the treatment of PD.

There are two prospective, randomised, surgical placebo-controlled trials
funded by the US National Institutes of Health that are in progress. They
are designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fetal
nigral transplantation for the treatment of PD. The results of one of them,
conducted by the University of Colorado and Columbia Presbyterian Medical
Center in New York, are likely to be presented in mid-1999. The second
trial, done collaboratively at Mt Sinai Medical Center in New York, the
University of South Florida in Tampa, and Rush Presbyterian Medical Center
in Chicago, is enrolling its last few patients. There are several technical
differences between these studies, and results may therefore vary. However,
the designs are appropriate for the assessments of novel cellular therapies
and are based on designs for pharmaceutical trials. They include the use of
placebo controls.

Alternatives to human fetal tissue as a graft source are being developed.
Novel cell types have been transplanted in laboratories or in phase I
clinical studies. These include porcine cells, differentiated human neuronal
cells derived from teratocarcinoma cell-lines, testis-derived Sertoli cells,
genetically engineered cells, and human neural stem cells.7-10 Logistical
and ethical concerns associated with the use of fetal tissues may be avoided
by the use of non-fetal cells.

Huntington's disease and stroke
Human and porcine embryonic striatal cells have been transplanted in
patients with Huntington's disease,10,11 and cells from a human cell-line
derived from neuroteratocarcinoma neurons have been implanted in stroke
patients.8 The safety of fetal spinal-cord transplants for the treatment of
syringomyelia is also being investigated. Data from these trials are
limited, anecdotal, and preliminary.

Conclusion
With neural reconstruction strategies being assessed for the treatment of
progressively complex neurological diseases, and with the possibility that
the development of cell-lines might soon replace the need for human fetal
tissue, neural transplantation could soon evolve into proven therapy.

References
<SNIP>