 |
 |
Harlan-The 60's reference was obviously an attempt (which evidentially failed in your case) to be amusing re: the marijuana. But I don't think things were "pretty decadent"; in many ways the early sixties were a time of innocence and fun, with the Beatles, and Carnaby Street and mini-skirts. Kind of the last hurrah, before friends, brothers, and lovers were sent to Viet Nam, before we saw a President assassinated on video, followed by an emminent Afro-American statesmen, and the President's brother. Even the drug scene was less lethal than it is today. I don't know, Harlan, maybe you had to be there. Carole H. --- "Harlan Williams, Jr." <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > In a message dated 7/29/99 11:58:10 AM, > [log in to unmask] writes: > > << Carole Hercun wrote: > > > > Does this mean we get to pretend its the 60's all > over > > again? Carole H. >> > > Carole: > > Some of us were born in the late 60's and do not > remember anything about the > 60's. I know the 60's was a pretty decadent decade, > with Vietnam, Woodstock > (the original), and the Beatles. But I find it hard > to believe that the 60's > was any better than the 90's has been, except for > the fact that I did not > have PD in the 60's. > > Harlan Williams > _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com