Dear list,
I too see it exactly the way that Stephan sees it. We don't need to be
policed on this list. It is fine just the way it is.
Ed
From: janet paterson <[log in to unmask]> on 08/06/99 02:42 PM GMT
Please respond to "Parkinson's Information Exchange"
<[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: (bcc: Edward W Raasch Jr/GDIS/GDYN)
Subject: Re: steeee-rike one -Reply
At 10:13 1999/08/06 -0400, you wrote:
>"STRIKE ONE" INDEED! WHAT NERVE YOU HAVE!
>How can a private, off-list message, not even addressed to you, =
>become the basis for the imposition of some sanction....other than =
>personal comment?
>Stephan Schwartz 55dx9
hi stephan
i'm sorry you see it that way
the list member who received this message
asked for my assistance
so i gave it
based on my recent statement on power
in fact, as it turns out
my 'strike one' description is irrelevant
since the anonymous sender is not a list-member, apparently
do you feel that the sender
of such an uninvited and unwelcome communication has more rights
than the receiver?
janet
janet paterson
52 now / 41 dx / 37 onset
snail-mail: PO Box 171 Almonte Ontario K0A 1A0 Canada
website: a new voice <http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Village/6263/>
e-mail: <[log in to unmask]>
