Print

Print


F.Y.I.

The sometimes contentious subject of parking for the disabled recently came
under the spotlight here in Western Australia when some PWP found that their
applications for parking permits were being refused.  In addition PWP who
already held permits found that on applying to have their permits renewed
they were required to undergo reassessment,  after which they too were being
refused.  The people this was happening to were all those who experienced
the 'on/off' syndrome, and they were being refused on the grounds that they
did not meet the criteria for a permit "at all times".

The Parkinson's Association of Western Australia (PAWA) queried this with
ACROD, the organisation responsible for administering the issuing of
permits.  Acrod advised the Association that they had received complaints
that many people who had permits, but did not appear to be disabled,
were using the Disabled Parking Bays.  In response to this perceived abuse
they had decided to review all applications for renewal (the permits are
issued for 2 years at a time) and to apply their existing criteria
vigourously.  The criteria were that:

1.    The applicant experience difficulty walking distances in excess of 50
metres.

2.    the applicant needed to open the vehicle door to its fullest extent in
order to enter or leave the vehicle.  (They indicated that to meet this
criterium the applicant would probably need to be using some form of walking
aid).

3.    the applicant must meet either of the above criteria at all times.

PAWA protested this saying that the criteria were too narrow and excluded a
number of PWP who:

1.    can walk further than 50 meters but only extremly slowly, and
hazardously

2.    because of their tendency to 'freeze' in confined spaces could not
exit from car doors unless they were wide open.

3.    experience the rapid daily fluctuations of the 'on/off' syndrome.

Acrod welcomed PAWA's query and invited the Association to make a formal
submission to their criteria review committee which, serendipitously, was
holding a meeting two weeks latter specifically, to discuss the subject of
'episodic functional limitation'.

As a result of that submission,  PAWA was invited to contribute to the
working party which devised the new criteria and protocols for assessing
those of us whose degree of disability fluctuates. The working party made
several recommendations which were then trialed and, a few weeks ago,
finally approved and instituted.

Acrod now accepts that PWP who have difficulty walking still qualify even if
they can walk further than 50 meters.  They also accept that PWP who need to
open the vehicle door to its widest in order to exit can qualify under the
2nd criterium. Finally the following criteria have been agreed for those
with the "on/off" syndrome:

1.    The PWP must be able to qualify under one of the usual criteria during
their 'off' periods.

2.    The PWP must experience multiple daily fluctuations.  (i.e. at least
two).

The Acrod application form has been redesigned and now specifically mentions
the PD 'on/off' syndrome, and  PWP with the 'on/off' syndrome are now
automatically referred to PAWA's Parkinson's Nurse Specialist for
assessment.  The system appears to be working and permits are once more
being issued to those who need them.


If anyone is experiencing similar difficulties with other permit authorities
I would be happy to forward to them the wording of the actual submission.

Dennis.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dennis Greene 49/dx 37/ onset 32
There's nothing wrong with me that a cure for PD won't fix!
[log in to unmask]
http://members.networx.net.au/~dennisg/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++