As a battle-scarred veteran of previous ListWars, I agree with Nita. Time for a cease-fire. Carole H. --- Nita Andres <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Actually, not too long ago in Denver a place where > these were kept frozen. Those > that the parents did not claim were defrosted and > discarded because the place ( I > have not idea what to call it ) went out of > business. > > This debate has gone on long enough. Nita > > William Heitman wrote: > > > In a message dated 9/17/99 11:31:23 AM Central > Daylight Time, > > [log in to unmask] writes: > > > > << each dismisses the > > others primary position (the humanity or > otherwise of an embryo) as being > > ridiculous and then, claiming the moral high > ground, proceeds to conduct the > > argument relevant to their own position. With > one side debating genocide > > and the other tissue transplants it's no wonder > the debate is making no > > progress. >> > > > > I believe you are correct in this assessment. The > real question is: > > Does fetal tissue (stem cells or other) drive > abortion? If the answer to > > that question is or can be made to be no, I > believe nobody will argue that > > flushing or incinerating the tissue rather than > using it in transplants is > > the superior moral position. > > > > WHH 56/38/37 > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com