 |
 |
Actually, not too long ago in Denver a place where these were kept frozen. Those that the parents did not claim were defrosted and discarded because the place ( I have not idea what to call it ) went out of business. This debate has gone on long enough. Nita William Heitman wrote: > In a message dated 9/17/99 11:31:23 AM Central Daylight Time, > [log in to unmask] writes: > > << each dismisses the > others primary position (the humanity or otherwise of an embryo) as being > ridiculous and then, claiming the moral high ground, proceeds to conduct the > argument relevant to their own position. With one side debating genocide > and the other tissue transplants it's no wonder the debate is making no > progress. >> > > I believe you are correct in this assessment. The real question is: > Does fetal tissue (stem cells or other) drive abortion? If the answer to > that question is or can be made to be no, I believe nobody will argue that > flushing or incinerating the tissue rather than using it in transplants is > the superior moral position. > > WHH 56/38/37