 |
 |
At 09:21 1999/09/25 +0800, you wrote: >Janet, > >Thank you for your clarifying note. My motive in asking you for it and the >way I asked were intended to reinforce the fact that there is no PD Topic >because the topic of this list is PD. It was also my intention to reinforce >the point that, far from being restricted to 5 headings as Kees suggests, PD >can be discussed in its infinite variety by simply not using a TOPIC >heading. > >In addition, in the spirit of your comments that 'none of this is set in >stone, we have 23 possible 'paring' methods' I asked that a refinement to >one of the TOPICS be considered. > >Unfortunately my post seems to have been interpreted by at least one person >as an attack and nit-picking. Neither of these was my intent, and in >retrospect I could have done it differently and better. My apologies if you >too saw it this way. > >However, in the absence of any reaction on your part to either my suggested >refinement or the perception that in making it I was splitting hairs, I am >going to really lay myself open to charges of all sorts by seeking one more >clarification - Do you want, or do you not want, suggestions from the rest >of us as to possible TOPICS? yes, of course! it's totally up to how you lot want to use it i'm too nosy to use topics i want to read everything janet janet paterson 52 now / 41 dx / 37 onset 613 256 8340 po box 171 almonte ontario canada K0A 1A0 a new voice: <http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Village/6263/> <[log in to unmask]>