Print

Print


I have found the discussion on these dietary supplements somewhat amusing but in
fact slightly off the mark. What I would like to know, is whether this stuff
actually works. There is a lot of discussion on traditional medication and
surgery, much of it very expensive (how much just for the two "pacemakers"?)
Now, it is certainly possible that the stuff actually works. So, to make a
judgment one really needs some independent data that confirms his claims, which
I have not seen. If there really is a measurable long term improvement it
certainly gives something for researchers to investigate. Of course looking at
the witches brew he prescribes one has to wonder about other long term health
effects.

I think, however,  to condemn someone for a discovery and  making money from it
is wrong. Isn't that what drug companies do? May be the stuff is expensive but
it is not patented (by him  [I think], nor should it be). If that is the case,
it is essentially trivial for somebody to compete with him at a lower price. But
if it really works, may be the antioxidant idea will become mainstream. However,
it makes me a little suspicious though to see a long list of ailments which
presumably respond to this type of medication.

K-F Etzold cg Carline.