 |
 |
Yes I got the same response from Specter. It, I think is not a measure of his committment as it is of how overwhelmed he and his staff are. It means nothing pro or con just that the opinion is registered with his office. Charlie ----- Original Message ----- From: Camilla Flintermann <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 7:03 PM Subject: Re: Sen Spector > Yes, thisis a form response--similar to the replies from an "autoresponder" > you get when you email the president. In my experience they all indicate > that they want to reply to THEIR constitutents, and ask of you are one you > should include postal address. They get an *emormous* volume of mail, "e" > and otherwise, and most letters I get are obviously form letters, that > tell me whet I wrote about and much of what I already know about the > subject, and probably told them in my letter! It takes a concerted and > repeated correspondence and a real struggle to personalize it in order to > get beyond the form responses, sadly. Specter is just doing what they all > do..... > > >Is everyone else getting replies from Sen Spector? > >I was shocked when I saw e-mail address w/his name. > >I figure it must be a "form reply" as I was told to include my postal address > >& phone # if I wanted further reply... but I did include the address. But I > >don't think it really did much good as he's *only* concerned about Penn. I > >hope I'm wrong! > > > >Bonnie > > > > Camilla Flintermann, <[log in to unmask]> > CG for Peter, 81/70/55 co-owner, CARE list > > http://www.newcountry.nu/pd/members/camilla/one.htm > > > "If the only tool you have is a hammer, > everything looks like a nail. " > ----Abraham Maslow