Print

Print


Sir James, Paul & Greg:  I think the jury is still out on the agonist only
VS sinemet in early onset(before age 55).  Since PD is the "designer"
disease it is, ie effecting each patient uniquely, it will be up to the
patient, the neurologist and interested observers to collaborate and try to
come up with the best plan of treatment for each individual person who has
Parkinson's.  What works for Paul, Greg or Sir james may not work for Lady
J.

Lady J AKNA Jeanette Fuhr 49/47/44? and who is recuperating from Marathon
Monday(a shopping experience at the outlet mall w/my sis B4 P day(Present
day).  Hope the smoke from our credit cards didn't cause anyone a problem!

----------
From: Greg Sterling <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sinemet will get you?
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:13 AM

Paul,
What exactly do you mean Sinemet will "get you"?  Have you read the side
effects on Requip?

Greg
47/35/35


Paul Lauer wrote:
>Sir James:
>My words can't be construed as advice because I am not a medical
professional
>and can't lay claim to a wealth of experience because I am only coming to
the
>end of my first year with the disease. However, (there always seems to be
>one), from everything I've read on this list and elsewhere, the better bet
is
>to to titrate away from Sinemet rather than toward it, so long as you can
do
>so without terribly affecting your quality of life. The idea being that
for
>most (and apparently not for all) , the Sinemet too will get you over time
so
>the longer the delay the longer it takes to get you. In the belief in this
>knowledge (which has been confirmed by both - count 'em - my Neuros) I am
>going in the other direction, increasing Requip and decreasing Sinemet.
>
>Regards,
>
>Paul H. Lauer
>