 |
 |
> Something scares me.Why would a reputable firm that had agreed to help Ivan > suddenly withdraw? I do not think they acted fairly, but neither do i know > their reasons. And i begin to think that my gut-level feeling may not be so > far off the mark. > I'm beginning to think that ivan is not the prime target, but that it is what > may be revealed if his case goes public that is at stake. In other words i > think that something is being covered up. That the portland authorities - the > government, the corporations - whoever it is who actually runs things there, > does not want to be seen to be doing whatever it is they are doing. Maybe i've > been reading too many novels of intrigue, but one could surely make a case - > maybe erroneously - for 'funny business'. In a town of that size - who are the > employers - the city government and the big corporations. So any lawyer, who > wants to keep his business going , will work for either the one or the other. > In fact, anybody who wants to do anything, needs one or the other or both. And > of course, the same people ( or their close relatives) are represented in both > groups - big business and city government. What hope does the little man have? > And so i call on the TV stations and their investigative reporters, particularly > those in other New England States and nearby Canadian provinces, PLEASE, to > go and see what is happening there. What is it they are trying to hide - and > hurting my friend Ivan in the process? > > hilary blue (50/33/24) > > Merlin H Brown wrote: > > > > ivan > > it is regretful that the law firm you were working with resigned from > > your case. that said, it was a pro bono case and the attorney and his > > firm had every right to do so. to publicly vilify the law firm and > > attorney because of their action is wrong. what firm will now take you > > case pro bono, knowing that the same fate may be theirs if they,of > > necessity, have to also resign the case? > > while i applaud your efforts, i believe that private communication might > > have accomplished much more than public denigration. > > > > best wishes with you future efforts > > murph 57/9 > > > > On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 16:34:24 -0500 Greg Sterling <[log in to unmask]> > > writes: > > > Ivan, > > > An email and a written letter will go out to your Scrooge attorney > > > wishing > > > him a joyless (oops, I meant joyful) > > > holiday. > > > > > > Hang in there Ivan. We're working behind the scenes. > > > Greg > > > > > > > > > Ivan wrote: > > > >I followed Phyllis' suggestion and called that 909 > > > >(Califiornia) phone number. No response yet. > > > > > > > >I think Greg's instinct is correct. I am SO angry and hurt. > > > > > > > >A polite and angry expression of concern would help--I > > > >am in shock and burned out . The firm is mittel, asen, > > > >hunter, and cary,l.l.c. The attorney who took my case(s) > > > >is peter evans. His e-mail address is: > > > > > > > >[log in to unmask] > > > >